Getting Healthy & Living Well- Information you can use!

Welcome To: Live Well Blog.

Here you will find lots of information below about having a healthy body and mind. No need to get sick and die before our time. Right?

Up until I leave this life and step into eternity, I want to have everything working well, brain included.

This can be done with the right knowledge and nutrients to make that happen. Getting active will help greatly. I hope you enjoy the information I have given below. Enjoy.



You Can, Solve Your Health And Pain Issues!



________________________________________________________


Government and Corporation are

making us sick

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Loose 6 pounds, just by eating grass feed beef

What is wrong with the beef you/we eat.
 Do you suffer or know someone who does, from depression, schizophrenia, attention deficit disorder (hyperactivity), or Alzheimer's disease.  Pass this on and help them start the road to recovery.   

Lower in Fat and Calories
There are a number of nutritional differences between the meat of pasture-raised and feedlot-raised animals. To begin with, meat from grass-fed cattle, sheep, and bison is lower in total fat. If the meat is very lean, it can have one third as much fat as a similar cut from a grain-fed animal. In fact, as you can see by the graph below, grass-fed beef can have the same amount of fat as skinless chicken breast, wild deer, or elk.[1] Research shows that lean beef actually lowers your "bad" LDL cholesterol levels.[2]

Data from J. Animal Sci 80(5):1202-11.
Because meat from grass-fed animals is lower in fat than meat from grain-fed animals, it is also lower in calories. (Fat has 9 calories per gram, compared with only 4 calories for protein and carbohydrates. The greater the fat content, the greater the number of calories.) As an example, a 6-ounce steak from a grass-finished steer can have 100 fewer calories than a 6-ounce steak from a grain-fed steer. If you eat a typical amount of beef (66.5 pounds a year), switching to lean grassfed beef will save you 17,733 calories a year without requiring any willpower or change in your eating habits. If everything else in your diet remains constant, you'll lose about six pounds a year. If all Americans switched to grassfed meat, our national epidemic of obesity might diminish.
In the past few years, producers of grass-fed beef have been looking for ways to increase the amount of marbling in the meat so that consumers will have a more familiar product. But even these fatter cuts of grass-fed beef are lower in fat and calories than beef from grain-fed cattle.
Extra Omega-3s - Meat from grass-fed animals has two to four times more omega-3 fatty acids than meat from grain- fed animals. Omega-3s are called "good fats" because they play a vital role in every cell and system in your body. For example, of all the fats, they are the most heart-friendly. People who have ample amounts of omega-3s in their diet are less likely to have high blood pressure or an irregular heartbeat. Remarkably, they are 50 percent less likely to suffer a heart attack.[3] Omega-3s are essential for your brain as well. People with a diet rich in omega-3s are less likely to suffer from depression, schizophrenia, attention deficit disorder (hyperactivity), or Alzheimer's disease.
[4]Another benefit of omega-3s is that they may reduce your risk of cancer. In animal studies, these essential fats have slowed the growth of a wide array of cancers and also kept them from spreading.[5] Although the human research is in its infancy, researchers have shown that omega-3s can slow or even reverse the extreme weight loss that accompanies advanced cancer and also hasten recovery from surgery.[6,7]
Omega-3s are most abundant in seafood and certain nuts and seeds such as flaxseeds and walnuts, but they are also found in animals raised on pasture. The reason is simple. Omega-3s are formed in the chloroplasts of green leaves and algae. Sixty percent of the fatty acids in grass are omega-3s. When cattle are taken off omega-3 rich grass and shipped to a feedlot to be fattened on omega-3 poor grain, they begin losing their store of this beneficial fat. Each day that an animal spends in the feedlot, its supply of omega-3s is diminished.[8] The graph below illustrates this steady decline.

Data from: J Animal Sci (1993) 71(8):2079-88.
It has been estimated that only 40 percent of Americans consume an adequate supply of omega-3 fatty acids. Twenty percent have blood levels so low that they cannot be detected.[10] Switching to the meat, milk, and dairy products of grass-fed animals is one way to restore this vital nutrient to your diet.




The preceding was excerpted from the following website:  http://www.lazy69ranch.com/index.html

Monday, November 14, 2011

Government is ignorant and doesn't care - Proof


As usual, a do nothing response.  I ask my Senator to do something to stop the Corporations from poisoning us and this is what I got back.   
If you would like to help, call this Senator's office and everyone else on capital hill.  Send them information on the subject so their employees can get educated influence the senators and congress people.  Thanks
Dear Mr.  ...
Thank you for contacting me regarding genetically modified organisms (GMOs). I appreciate your taking the time to write. I understand your concerns regarding GMOs. While I am not a member of the Agriculture Committee, I understand the importance of this issue and I will keep your comments in mind should the Senate debate this issue. Again, thank you for writing. I hope you will continue to keep me informed of issues of importance ot you and your community.
Sincerely,

JEFF BINGAMAN
United States Senator
Phone:  (202) 224-5521
Toll-free in NM: 1-800-443-8658
Website:  http://bingaman.senate.gov
Subscribe to my e-newsletter.
Look for me on Facebook and YouTube.

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Stevia Sweet Stevia

I found this website for buying stevia at a good price compared to what it costs in most stores. http://www.mothernature.com/s/stevia/1126.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=stevia%20ice%20cream&utm_content=Stevia&utm_campaign=sections&kid=228978
Myself, I love the taste of stevia, as long as I don't use to much at a time. I wish my wife liked it as much as I do.  

Details about stevia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevia

Store bought table sugar is 50% fructose and because they put fructose in just about everything.

The following information has been taken form Organic life style Magazine.  Some of the information is reworded and some is excerpted.

Sugar, Honey, Fructose and Glucose information

Glucose

A simple sugar made by the body through digestion of carbohydrates. It is the body's chief source of energy. Glucose = dextrose.

Sucrose

Sucrose is table sugar. It is made from highly processed sugar cane or sugar beets. (Note: much of the Sugar beets are GMO these days.)  Sucrose is a combination of glucose and fructose these days, which separates during digestion. Pure sucrose has no nutrients.

Fructose

Fructose is fruit sugar, a simple sugar, also found in honey, tree fruits, berries, and melons. But don't be fooled into thinking fructose on a label means you are eating fruit sugar. Pure crystalline fructose comes from two sources: corn or sucrose (table sugar). Corn starch (which is probably GMO which contains pesticides in the DNA of the product.) is processed to release fructose. Sucrose (table sugar) is enzymatically hydrolyzed to separate into glucose and fructose. Crystalline fructose is pure fructose that comes from one of these two sources.

High fructose syrup

High Fructose Corn Syrup is made from starches like corn, wheat, and rice. High fructose syrups contain nearly equal amounts of glucose and fructose, a composition nearly identical to sucrose (table sugar). The reason high fructose corn syrup is so abundant in our processed food is simple-it's cheaper than sugar. Because we highly subsidize corn and place tariffs on sugar imports, high fructose corn syrup is much less expensive.
Pure fructose is 1.2-1.8 times sweeter than sucrose so less is needed for the same level of sweetness. It is low on the glycemic index, therefore it does not lead to peaks and dips in the body's glucose levels. But fructose is processed in the liver. When too much fructose enters the liver at once, the liver can't process fructose as a sugar. Instead, the liver turns excess fructose into fats-triglycerides. When you incorporate these fats into our bodies cells (the cell membranes) triglycerides cause these cells to be insulin resistant. This is the reason that high fructose corn syrup leads to diabetes. Fructose is linked to significant increases of both cholesterol and triglycerides. Fructose, like sucrose-is a highly refined processed sugar devoid of any nutrition.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

The American Diet - Bad News


More FYI

The USDA has stated that Americans need to eat approximately 50 % more vegetables, 150% more fruits, 250% more orange vegetables and 350% more green vegetables daily! The recommendation is 7 to 13 servings per day to improve health and prevent chronic disease. But, with today’s busy lifestyles and fast food eating habits, few American adults, and far fewer children, even eat the recommended minimum of 5-A-Day!  I believe that getting healthy food is impossible unless you read the labels and even then you can't be sure. 
You see, the government scientist know what we need to live long with health but congress has been bought off by the corporations and are deceived themselves.

Do genetically-manipulated, chemical-laden fields of crops cannot perform to the output and standards of organic farming and actually cost more to produce?

A recent 30-year study at Pennsylvania's Rodale Institute comparing conventional and organic farming methods has produced some interesting results. (Rodale Institute: The Farming Systems )
Here are some quick numbers from the study:
  • Organic methods produced 4,079 lbs per acre - conventional farming produced 4,022 lbs per acre.
  • Organic methods netted $558 per acre profit - conventional farming netted $190 per acre profit.
  • It took 3,264 megajoules of energy to produce organic crops per acre per year. It took 4,568 megajoules of energy to produce those same crops conventionally.
  • Greenhouse gas emissions from organics were 906 lbs of carbon dioxide per acre a year with organics. Conventional crops produced 1,400 lbs of carbon dioxide per acre a year.
  • In years of drought, organic crops outperformed even those GMO crops designated "drought resistant."
According to Andre Leu in his article The Benefits of Organic Food, "A scientific study published in the Journal of Applied Nutrition in 1993 clearly showed that organic food is more nutritious than conventional food. Organically and conventionally grown apples, potatoes, pears, wheat, and sweet corn were purchased over two years in the western suburbs of Chicago, and then analyzed for mineral content. The organically grown food was on average 63 percent higher in calcium, 73 percent higher in iron, 118 percent higher in magnesium, 178 percent higher in molybdenum, 91 percent higher in phosphorus, 125 percent higher in potassium, and 60 percent higher in zinc. In addition, the organic food was on average 29 percent lower in mercury than the conventionally raised food." Taken from Earthly Delights: Do You Know?

This excerpt was taken from the following "Off The grid" website: https://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=en&tab=wm#inbox/132fdde189e11171

From this, I would like to suggest that if more farmers would get to growing organic, the prices in the stores would come down.  We also need to get congress to stop allowing natural seeds to be patented or in the future, you will not be able to buy organic seeds and save them from your crops if you grow your own.


Wednesday, October 12, 2011

The FDA Ignored Own Scientists’ Warnings About the Safety of GM Food


no gmo

Internal US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents reveal that the agency’s own scientists expressed doubts about its policy toward labeling genetically modified foods, while raising questions about the foods’ safety.

The FDA’s policy toward genetically modified foods has been that they are “substantially equivalent” to conventional foods and therefore don’t require special labels—unlike most other industrialized nations that require labeling.

“Profound difference” between GM and conventional foods

FDA’s policy, established in 1992, states, “The agency is not aware of any information showing that foods derived by these new (genetic engineering) methods differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way, or that, as a class, foods developed by the new technologies present any different or greater safety concern than foods developed by traditional plant breeding.”
But FDA internal documents released in the late 1990s during a lawsuit against the agency show that the FDA’s own scientists had serious doubts about GM foods when the policy was being established.
In a February 1992 memo, Louis J. Pribyl, Ph.D., a scientist in the FDA’s Microbiology Group, critiqued a draft of the policy by writing, “There is a profound difference between the types of unexpected effects from traditional breeding and genetic engineering which is just glanced over in this document.” Dr. Pribyl added that “several aspects of gene insertion may be more hazardous than traditional plant crossbreeding.”
Linda Kahl, Ph.D., an FDA compliance officer, objected that the agency was, “trying to fit a square peg into a round hole [by] trying to force an ultimate conclusion that there is no difference between foods modified by genetic engineering and foods modified by traditional breeding practices.” She continued, “The processes of genetic engineering and traditional breeding are different, and according to the technical experts in the agency, they lead to different risks.”
E.J. Matthews, Ph.D., of the FDA’s Toxicology group warned in an October 1991 memo, “genetically modified plants could also contain unexpected high concentrations of plant toxicants.”
In a November 1991 memo to James Maryanski, Ph.D., the agency’s Biotechnology Coordinator, FDA’s Division of Food Chemistry and Technology cautioned, “it would be necessary to demonstrate that edible seed and oils produced from genetically engineered plants do not contain unintended potentially harmful substances at levels that would cause concern.”
The above was excerpted from the following website:  
http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2011/10/06/gmo-food-safety/

Friday, October 7, 2011

Getting a vaccine these days can make you sterile, put you in a wheel chair and do a mired of other things to your body.  The put mercury in them.  I would never again take a vaccine.  How about you.


The following was excerpted from: http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/10/06/flu-vaccine-pushed-despite-nerve-disease-link/

The H1N1 vaccine scourge is in full force and so is the push. What isn’t emphasized among the government and medical community is the strong link between the vaccine and a rare, debilitating nerve disease.
The Guillain-Barre Syndrome and death link is well known, but that doesn’t keep doctors from administering them even though 50 percent of doctors are refusing them. HFA has reported this deadly link two years ago as well as with other vaccines such as Menactra, which is pushed for babies.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Some bad things about fast food served in fast food restaurants:

Reasons I choose not to eat in fast food restaurants anymore.   
The chemical that they put in much of it will destroy your health and the health of your grand kids, if indeed you will have any because of the GMO.  (Genetically Modified Organism) McDonald s, I am told is the largest purchaser of GMO potatoes that they sell in their french frys.  Look up GMO and rats. Look up GMO corn and mice.  No more reproduction and tumors throughout the body.  These are just a few good reasons not to eat fast food.

In a report on at rats eating GMO food, the following was found. We are talking about a time frame of weeks when problems emerged from eating the GMO foods.
 ( Full study: http://www.rapaluruguay.org/transgenicos/Maiz/Genetically_Maize.pdf)

I don't want my kidneys to fail from eating GMO food.  "Read this from the link above: If all the data are taken together, and overall in regard to the specifically disturbed urine chemistry parameters at weeks 5 and 14
(Table 2), which were not indicated by Hammond et al. (2006), it could be concluded that a
GM-linked male renal toxicity is observed in this work".

"...greater kidney sensitivity in males and liver sensitivity in females".

Body weight:  This results in 3.3% decrease in weight for males and 3.7% increase for females.

Chocolate- is it good for you?

This gal is really sharp.  I am glad that I like dark chocolate.  The milk chocolate does not have very much good in it.  This is good information and fun to watch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJ_cIA8152w

Monday, September 26, 2011

Don't forget to read the bread labels

A danger in bread: If the bread you buy has azodicarbonamide ( look it up) in it, I suggest you call the company and tell them that you will not be buying there bread anymore until they take azodicarbonamid out of it. It is a respiratory sensitiser          (a possible cause of asthma).  
  
 

More people are getting cancer than ever before

A new report says more people are getting cancer than ever before.  Why doesn't someone ask why.  GMO and other food chemicals are why.  No I can't prove it but it makes sense.  


As I write this, there is a commercial playing on the radio talking about needing donations for finding a cancer cure.  I say, stop eating the poison, start eating only healthy food.  You need to spend time researching what to eat and what not to eat as I am doing.  Then you will get well and keep the cancers away.  


The published report - September issue of Lancet Oncology.  The worldwide cost  for cancer care: $895 billion in 2008.  Expect 22 million new cancer patients by 2030. Add another $286 billion in costs. So the corporations poison us for profit and the Medical community pretends to heal us for profit.  This is not conspiracy.   This is fact!  Just read the labels and use the internet to find out what you are eating and what it does to you.  Your eating habits will begin to change and you will start getting healthier.


Stop being ignorant.  It's not healthy.  Right?  Please join me in calling the food companies and telling them if they can't tell you that there is no GMO food in there product that you won't buy it anymore.  Do the same with bad chemicals in the food. Thanks for helping if you do.  Good researching to you.   

Thursday, September 22, 2011

NUTS: Combating the poison & lack of nutrition in the food supply

     You have to do some work to keep from loosing your health and brain function.  I don't want dementia or Alzheimers, do you?  You had better start now.  


Ah, Nuts  -  Before going nuts - eat them!


Walnuts Boost Inferential Reasoning: http://preventdisease.com/news/11/092111_Walnuts_Boost_Inferential_Reasoning.shtml


Why Soak Nuts, Grains, Beans, Peas, Before Eating?


Soak nuts before eating:  http://glutenfreerecipebox.com/why-soak-nuts-grains-beans-peas-before-eating
     I read some time ago that grains having Phytates should be soaked overnight.  This used to be done in bygone years.  To have cereal in the morning the family would let the grain soak overnight, drain off the water in the morning and thus be healthier.  
     All nuts and seeds contain enzyme inhibitors which will neutralize some of the enzymes our bodies produce. Your body needs enzymes to survive.  Note:  there is another view also, click here: Phytates  

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

The World According To Monsanto - FULL LENGTH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YH4OwBYDQe8

Watch this movie and you will be greatly educated.  Monsanto is responsible for the creation of 90% of all GMO seeds and crops.  This is not a nice company.  It is about greed and poisoning of the public, us.

Round up effects cell division and we are getting it in our food supply. Even unborn children are getting round up.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Silver for health is the best silver investing you can do.

     Years ago people knew how to keep their food from going bad without chemicals. Silver coins dropped in fresh milk prevented souring and kept unhealthy bacteria from growing. When the wagon trains came west, silver dollars were dropped into the water barrows to reduce the growth of bacteria and help keep the water fresh.  Now we use chemicals like chlorine, so what is that doing to our insides.  
     As a kid, I hated drinking chlorine tainted water, but when we went to our cabin and drank fresh well water, I loved it.  Or even water direct from the river. It all tasted so good.
     More on silver to come:  The right kind of silver can cure cancer and most other pathogens.  I will be sharing how you can get this in the weeks to come.  

Monday, September 19, 2011

All plant life on earth could have been destroyed!

http://www.offthegridnews.com/2011/09/19/the-future-of-american-agriculture-genetically-engineered-arrogance-and-the-threat-of-the-anti-life-sciences/
The following is excerpted form Off The Grid News:   Read the rest of the article at the above link.
Life scientists who have given themselves permission to play God may accidentally create something cataclysmic and apocalyptic all on their own. And the scary thing about this possibility is that it is not theoretical – it has actually already happened.
Klebsiella Planticola: The Real-Life Frankenstein’s Monster
In the early 1990′s, a European biotechnology corporation was all set to release a genetically modified version of a common plant bacteria called klebsiella planticola, which normally helps break down dead organic material so it can be re-absorbed into the soil. The new strain of this microbe was genetically altered to create two useful substances from undifferentiated dead biomass: alcohol and organic fertilizer. The new microbes would be spread on cropland after harvest, and the products they produced from dead and dying plants could then be collected and sold on world markets.
There was only one problem with this scheme. The genetically modified klebsiella planticola, unlike the natural version, did not terminate after finishing its work. On the contrary, the new microbe survived the fermentation process it instigated in order to create alcohol from raw plant material, and if it had been released into nature as a part of fertilizer, it would have immediately attacked any plant life growing in adjacent soil, setting off a process of alcohol fermentation that would inevitably lead to the death of that plant life. As the new bacterium divided and multiplied, it would then have continued to spread from plant to plant, from field to field, from forest to forest, and so on, until it had wiped out every living plant on the face of the earth. If this genetically-engineered form of klebsiella planticola had actually been released into nature, it could have literally scoured the surface of the entire planet unless scientists had been able to come up with some kind of miracle to stop it.
What is most frightening about this situation is that this apocalypse microbe had actually been approved for use by regulatory agencies responsible for monitoring the creation of new geneticallyaltered life forms. It was only because of a fortuitous and random review of this new form of klebsiella planticola by a professor at Oregon State University that its potentially devastating effects were discovered before it could be released onto the market.
Heeding the Warnings
The story coming out of the Iowa cornfields is only the latest piece of evidence that reveals the dangerous road that we have embarked upon. God created nature in a way that was perfectly balanced and capable of meeting the needs of all creatures great or small, without the need for arrogant intervention by men and women convinced they know better. If we are not careful, we are ultimately going to genetically engineer ourselves right out of existence.

Monday, September 12, 2011


...HARMFUL EFFECTS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) FOODS
In a sentence

This article outlines the many harmful effects of GM or genetically-modified foods (known also as genetically-engineered foods) and representng lab-created GMOs or genetically-modified organisms...


The following is excerpted from the following website: http://www.raw-wisdom.com/50harmful.


Introduction
What is called "biotechnology" is a vital issue that impacts all of us.
Largely between 1997 and 1999, genetically modified (GM)  food ingredients suddenly appeared in2/3rds of all US processed foods. This food alteration was fueled by a single Supreme Court ruling. It allowed, for the first time, the patenting of life forms for commercialization. Since then thousands of applications for experimental genetically-modified (GM) organisms, including quitebizarre GMOs, have been filed with the US Patent Office alone, and many more abroad. Furthermore an economic war broke out to own equity in firms that legally claimed such patent rights or the means to control not only genetically modified organisms but vast reaches of human food supplies. This has been the behind-the-scenes and key factor for some of the largest and rapid agri-chemical firm mergers in history. The merger of Pioneer Hi-Bed and Dupont (1997), Novartis AG and AstraZeneca PLC (2000), plus Dow's merger with Rohm and Haas(2001) are three prominent examples,  Few consumers are aware this has been going on and is ever continuing. Yet if you recently ate soya sauce in a Chinese restaurant, munched popcorn in a movie theatre, or indulged in an occasional candy bar - you've undoubtedly ingested this new type of food. You may have, at the time, known exactly how much salt, fat and carbohydrates were in each of these foods because regulations mandate their labeling for dietary purposes. But you would not know if the bulk of these foods, and literally every cell had been genetically altered!
In just those three years, as much as 1/4th of all American agricultural lands or 70-80 million acres were quickly converted to raise genetically-modified (GM) food and crops. And in the race to increase GM crop production verses organics, the former is winning. For details, see our articleWho is Winning The Race Between GM Global and Organic Crop Production?

"If people let government decide what 
foods they eat and what medicines 
they take, their bodies will soon be 
in as sorry a state as are the souls 
of those who live under tyranny." 
Thomas Jefferson

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Top 10 food additives to avoid and If you don't read the labels and choose to eat the right thing, it will hurt you and your family!


Some food additives are worse than others. Food Matters suggests these as the top ones to avoid:
  1. nutrition labelArtificial Sweeteners
    Aspartame, also known as Nutrasweet and Equal, is believed to be carcinogenic and accounts for more reports of adverse reactions than all other foods and food additives combined.
    The artificial sweetener Acesulfame-K has been linked to kidney tumors. All artificial sweeteners are bad news.
  2. High Fructose Corn Syrup
    High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) increases your LDL ("bad") cholesterol levels and contributes to the development of diabetes.
  3. Monosodium Glutamate (MSG)
    MSG is used as a flavor enhancer. It is an excitotoxin, a substance that overexcites cells to the point of damage or death.
  4. Trans Fat
    Numerous studies show that trans fat increases LDL cholesterol levels and increases your risk of heart attacks, heart disease and strokes.
  5. Common Food Dyes
    Artificial colorings may contribute to behavioral problems in children and lead to a significant reduction in IQ.
  6. Sodium Sulphite
    This is a preservative used in processed foods. People who are sulfite sensitive can experience headaches, breathing problems, and rashes. In severe cases, sulfites can actually cause death.
  7. Sodium Nitrate/Sodium Nitrite
    This common preservative has been linked to various types of cancer.
  8. BHA and BHT
    Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydrozyttoluene (BHT) are preservatives that affect the neurological system of your brain, alter behavior and have the potential to cause cancer.
  9. Sulphur Dioxide
    Sulphur additives are toxic and in the U.S., they have been prohibited in raw fruit and vegetables. Adverse reactions include bronchial problems, low blood pressure, and anaphylactic shock.
  10. Potassium Bromate
    This additive is used to increase volume in some breads. It is known to cause cancer in animals, and even small amounts can create problems for humans.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Covert Sterilization...

Our family has started to not eat corn or High Fructose Corn Syrup. With 85% of the corn now GMO, It is in almost everything.  Just try to find a loaf of bread with out HFCS in it.  Something else I noticed at the store when looking for spaghetti sauce and Baked beans.  Only one spaghetti sauce was worth looking at and it was the most expensive. That is the same with the bread.  Oh, and the beans.  The ones that we all learned to love are also full of HFCS.  It is like people who don't have money, are stupid, so make it cheaper and we get rid of the poor in a couple of generations.  Check out mice and GMO corn. 3rd Generation, they are sterile. Take a good read of the following.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following was excerpted from this web blog: http://www.matchdoctor.com/blog_85536/Covert_Sterilization.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Covert Sterilization...

posted 3/25/2008  

 
 lacyvsq
 
Birth control made easy...eat a taco, drink a coke...get a tetanus shot...
...Corn, sacred in Mexico and Central America as the very staff of life, has been turned into the very end of life. Genetic modification of corn has turned the Mexo American giver of life into the stuff that can end a race - perhaps the human race - by engendering sterility in males who eat it.

Genetically modified corn is used to create high fructose corn syrup, flavors, starches, flours, proteins, sugars and most of the other ingredients which make up our processed foods. The US refuses to allow the labeling of foods which contain genetically modified ingredients (like corn) to be labeled to indicate that fact so we are looking at the possibility of undeclared birth control “foods” rendering whole populations sterile. The US Government, starting with George Herbert Walker Bush, has adopted the policy that genetically modified foods are the same as unmodified ones. The sterility corn is therefore, under this policy, the same as natural corn. 

...A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto.

In the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, allegedly against Tetanus, a sickness arising from such things as stepping on a rusty nail. The vaccine was not given to men or boys, despite the fact they are presumably equally liable to step on rusty nails as women.

Because of that curious anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the Tetanus vaccine being spread by the WHO only to women of child-bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.

It later came out that the Rockefeller Foundation along with the Rockefeller’s Population Council, the World Bank (home to CGIAR), and the United States’ National Institutes of Health had been involved in a 20-year-long project begun in 1972 to develop the concealed abortion vaccine with a tetanus carrier for WHO. In addition, the Government of Norway, the host to the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault, donated $41 million to develop the special abortive Tetanus vaccine...
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=563

ConAgra Sued Over GMO ’100% Natural’ Cooking Oils

Right on!  Let US Americans start the lawsuits rolling.  We need to putt a stop to all of the poison food they are feeding us.  If don't than a few generations, our children may all be sterile.


 “If you use Wesson brand cooking oils, you might be able to join a class action suit against food giant ConAgra for deceptively marketing the products as natural.” One plaintiff is making waves by suing ConAgra because he relied on their “100% natural” labels, only to find out they are made mostly with genetically modified ingredients.
This lawsuit may pave a way for a major rift among major food companies who have possibly gotten away with murder, spouting their “all natural” claims. The FDA turns a blind eye towards their false labeling.
Both Monsanto and WHO admit that genetically modified plants are not natural.
Along with the GMO factor, these oils contain high amounts of Omega 6 fatty acids which can hurt the heart if there are too much in the diet.
~Health Freedoms

These days it’s hard to walk down a supermarket aisle without bumping into a food product that claims to be “all-natural.” If you’ve ever wondered how even some junk food products can claim this moniker (witness: Cheetos Natural Puff White Cheddar Cheese Flavored Snacks – doesn’t that sound like it came straight from your garden?) the answer is simple if illogical: the Food and Drug Administration has not defined the term natural.
So food marketers, knowing that many shoppers are increasingly concerned about healthful eating, figured: why not just slap the natural label on anything we can get away with? That wishful thinking may soon be coming to an end if a few clever consumer lawyers have anything to say about it.
While various lawsuits have been filed in recent years claiming that food companies using the term natural are engaging in deceptive marketing, a suit filed in June in California against ConAgra could make the entire industrial food complex shake in its boots.
The plaintiff claims he relied on Wesson oils “100% natural” label, when the products are actually made from genetically modified organisms.
GMOs Not Exactly Natural, So Says Monsanto
Ironically, the complaint cites a definition of GMOs by none other than Monsanto, the company most notorious for its promotion of the technology. According to Monsanto, GMOs are: “Plants or animals that have had their genetic makeup altered to exhibit traits that are not naturally theirs.”
The complaint also quotes a GMO definition from the World Health Organization: “Organisms in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally.”
Four Wesson varieties are implicated in the case: Canola Oil, Vegetable Oil, Corn Oil, and Best Blend. And it’s not just on the label that ConAgra is using the natural claim, but also online and in print advertisements. (Additional silly health claims on the website include “cholesterol free”–vegetable oils couldn’t possibly contain cholesterol anyway.)
The complaint describes the extent of ConAgra’s deception, alleging the “labels are intended to evoke a natural, wholesome product.” And further:
The “100% Natural” statement is, like much of the label on Wesson Oils, displayed in vibrant green. The “Wesson” name is haloed by the image of the sun, and the Canola Oil features a picture of a green heart.
A green heart — you just can’t get any healthier than that. However, as registered dietitian Andy Bellatti told me: “These oils are high in omega 6 fatty acids, which in excessive amounts are actually bad for your heart.” Guess they left that part out of the green heart icon.
Supermarkets Chock-full of GMOs
But what makes this lawsuit especially intriguing is its potentially far-ranging impact. According to the Center for Food Safety: “upwards of 70 percent of processed foods on supermarket shelves — from soda to soup, crackers to condiments — contain genetically-engineered ingredients.” While it’s unclear how many of these products also claim to be natural, given all the greenwashing going on these days, it’s likely to number in the thousands.
Specifically, up to 85 percent of U.S. corn is genetically engineered as are 91 percent of soybeans, both extremely common ingredients in processed foods. Numerous groups including the Center for Food Safety have been calling attention to the potential hazards of GMOs for years. From their website:
A number of studies over the past decade have revealed that genetically engineered foods can pose serious risks to humans, domesticated animals, wildlife and the environment. Human health effects can include higher risks of toxicity, allergenicity, antibiotic resistance, immune-suppression and cancer.
Not exactly the stuff that green hearts are made of. The legal complaint also notes that on its corporate website (“but not on the Wesson site that consumers are more likely to visit”), ConAgra implies that its oils are genetically engineered. The company concludes: “Ultimately, consumers will decide what is acceptable in the marketplace based on the best science and public information available.”
But by being told the oils are “100% natural,” consumers can no longer make an informed decision as they are being misled.
Which reminds me of a great quote from Fast Food Nation author Eric Schlosser: “If they have to put the word ‘natural’ on a box to convince you, it probably isn’t.”
————————-
Michele Simon is a public health lawyer specializing in industry marketing and lobbying tactics. She is the author of Appetite for Profit: How the Food Industry Undermines Our Health and How to Fight Back, and research and policy director at Marin Institute, an alcohol industry watchdog group.
Source:
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_23832.cfm
http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/09/06/conagra-sued-over-gmo-100-natural-cooking-oils/
 The above information was excerpted from the following Link: